Discussion:
Sarprop in python bindings and cpp class + fann_trainer
Vincenzo Di Massa
2007-03-30 12:49:25 UTC
Permalink
I just updated the cpp class, and the python bindings to support the (not so)
new sarprop algorithm, I'm about to commit the code.
What is the status of sarprop in fann? It seems there are many TODO left in
the code. I never used this algorithm before. It seems to find good solutions
on my dataset...

The fann_trainer helper application is evolving fast: I added sarprop support
and many more cmdline options... now it builds using cmake.

It would be nice to build fann itself using cmake, and I voulounteer to add
the needed CMakeFiles.txt.
Believe me, if you give CMake a try you will never like autotools again (if
you ever liked).


Sarprop code is on its way to the cvs, fann trainer is ready as well, but...
where would you like me to put it? aside the fann dir or inside ti?

Regards
Vincenzo

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
Steffen Nissen
2007-03-30 14:16:01 UTC
Permalink
The automake tools will stay arround for a bit, not as much because it is
easy to maintain or use, but because many Unix/Linux users expect that
"./configure && make && sudo make install" is the way to install. This
method is also supported on many platforms.

Steffen
Post by Vincenzo Di Massa
I just updated the cpp class, and the python bindings to support the (not so)
new sarprop algorithm, I'm about to commit the code.
What is the status of sarprop in fann? It seems there are many TODO left in
the code. I never used this algorithm before. It seems to find good solutions
on my dataset...
The fann_trainer helper application is evolving fast: I added sarprop support
and many more cmdline options... now it builds using cmake.
It would be nice to build fann itself using cmake, and I voulounteer to add
the needed CMakeFiles.txt.
Believe me, if you give CMake a try you will never like autotools again (if
you ever liked).
Sarprop code is on its way to the cvs, fann trainer is ready as well, but...
where would you like me to put it? aside the fann dir or inside ti?
Regards
Vincenzo
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Fann-general mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fann-general
--
Steffen Nissen - http://MySpace.com/SteffenNissen
Project Administrator - Fast Artificial Neural Network Library (fann)
http://fann.sf.net
Vincenzo Di Massa
2007-03-30 15:45:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steffen Nissen
The automake tools will stay arround for a bit, not as much because it is
easy to maintain or use, but because many Unix/Linux users expect that
"./configure && make && sudo make install" is the way to install.
I'm one of them them! I was not suggesting to remove them. I just told that
when you get used to CMake... well, you can't live without :-)
Post by Steffen Nissen
This
method is also supported on many platforms.
Steffen
CMakeFiles.txt could coexist in the repo. They do not interfere with
autotools. Can I commit them when I find the time to write them down?

Regards
Vincenzo

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
Steffen Nissen
2007-03-31 18:52:26 UTC
Permalink
Please do commit them.
Post by Vincenzo Di Massa
Post by Steffen Nissen
The automake tools will stay arround for a bit, not as much because it
is
Post by Steffen Nissen
easy to maintain or use, but because many Unix/Linux users expect that
"./configure && make && sudo make install" is the way to install.
I'm one of them them! I was not suggesting to remove them. I just told that
when you get used to CMake... well, you can't live without :-)
Post by Steffen Nissen
This
method is also supported on many platforms.
Steffen
CMakeFiles.txt could coexist in the repo. They do not interfere with
autotools. Can I commit them when I find the time to write them down?
Regards
Vincenzo
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Fann-general mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fann-general
--
Steffen Nissen - http://MySpace.com/SteffenNissen
Project Administrator - Fast Artificial Neural Network Library (fann)
http://fann.sf.net
Loading...